Al-Dujaili E A, Forrest G C, Edwards C R, Landon J
Clin Chem. 1979 Aug;25(8):1402-5.
We compared conventional charcoal separation of antibody-bound and free antigen with a novel method involving magnetizable particles containing charcoal. The magnetizable charcoal separation method was as effective as the conventional method for a wide range of radioimmunoassays, including those for several steroids and small polypeptide hormones. In a detailed comparison of conventional vs. magnetizable charcoal for radioimmunoassay of aldosterone, the magnetizable charcoal had several advantages: it did not require prior coating with dextran or protein, varied less with time and temperature, required no centrifugation, and took less time for separation. The correlation of results obtained with magnetizable and conventional charcoal separation was excellent (n = 89, r = 0.98, p less than 0.001), and the coefficient of variation for the separation with magnetizable charcoal was 0.5%.
我们将抗体结合抗原与游离抗原的传统木炭分离法,与一种涉及含木炭的可磁化颗粒的新方法进行了比较。对于广泛的放射免疫分析,包括几种类固醇和小多肽激素的分析,可磁化木炭分离法与传统方法一样有效。在对醛固酮放射免疫分析中传统木炭与可磁化木炭的详细比较中,可磁化木炭有几个优点:它不需要预先用葡聚糖或蛋白质包被,随时间和温度的变化较小,不需要离心,分离所需时间较短。用可磁化木炭分离和传统木炭分离获得的结果相关性极佳(n = 89,r = 0.98,p小于0.001),可磁化木炭分离的变异系数为0.5%。