Stern R B, Maxwell J D, Knill-Jones R P, Thompson R P, Williams R
Br Med J. 1973 Jun 30;2(5869):767-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5869.767.
Of 374 patients with jaundice seen in the liver unit over a four-year period 21 were finally thought to be hypersensitive to one of seven different drugs. The clinical, laboratory, and histological features were often difficult to distinguish from those of viral hepatitis, tumour of the extrahepatic biliary tree, or primary biliary cirrhosis. A computer-assisted diagnostic model made use of minor differences, and made a correct diagnosis in all patients. Even when information about drug ingestion was left out it was still correct in 81% of patients. Sixty-four other patients gave a history of ingestion of potentially hepatotoxic drugs of whom 62 were correctly diagnosed by the computer. In the complete series of 374 patients only two were incorrectly computed to have drug jaundice when there was no history of drug ingestion.Two additional patients became jaundiced after exposure to drugs, but were found to have primary biliary cirrhosis.
在四年时间里,肝脏科诊治的374例黄疸患者中,最终认为有21例对七种不同药物中的一种过敏。其临床、实验室及组织学特征常难以与病毒性肝炎、肝外胆管肿瘤或原发性胆汁性肝硬化相鉴别。一个计算机辅助诊断模型利用了细微差异,对所有患者都做出了正确诊断。即便不考虑药物摄入信息,该模型对81%的患者诊断仍正确。另外64例患者有摄入潜在肝毒性药物的病史,其中62例被计算机正确诊断。在这374例患者的完整系列中,只有两例在无药物摄入史的情况下被错误地计算为药物性黄疸。另有两例患者在接触药物后出现黄疸,但被发现患有原发性胆汁性肝硬化。