Washington J A, Dearing W H, Judd E S, Elveback L R
Ann Surg. 1974 Oct;180(4):567-72. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197410000-00021.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to compare preoperative antibiotic preparation with neomycin (group 1), neomycin and tetracycline (group 2), and placebo (group 3) in patients undergoing elective intestinal surgery. The 196 patients were approximately equally distributed among the three study groups, which proved similar to each other in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, site of lesion, and operative procedure. There were significantly (P < 0.01) fewer patients with postoperative wound sepsis in the neomycin-tetracycline group (group 2) than in either of the two other groups. Postoperative wound infection rates in groups 1 and 3 were nearly identical. Most infections contained both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Eight of nine episodes of septicemia due to Bacteroides fragilis occurred in patients in groups 1 and 3.
进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,以比较在接受择期肠道手术的患者中,术前使用新霉素(第1组)、新霉素和四环素(第2组)以及安慰剂(第3组)进行抗生素准备的效果。196例患者大致平均分配到三个研究组,这三组在年龄、性别、诊断、病变部位和手术操作方面彼此相似。新霉素 - 四环素组(第2组)术后伤口脓毒症患者明显少于其他两组(P < 0.01)。第1组和第3组的术后伤口感染率几乎相同。大多数感染同时包含需氧菌和厌氧菌。9例由脆弱拟杆菌引起的败血症中有8例发生在第1组和第3组的患者中。