Hake D F, Campbell R L
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):303-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-303.
Bar-pressing (Experiment I) or key-pressing (Experiments II and III) responses of monkeys were reinforced according to a fixed-interval schedule of negative reinforcement: the first response after a fixed interval of time terminated regularly spaced shocks for a fixed time designated as the reinforcement period. During extinction, shocks continued during the reinforcement period. That there were two types of responding generated by shock alone was indicated by (1) the level of responding maintained during extinction relative to conditions without shock, (2) the stability of two between-shock response patterns across reinforcement and extinction conditions, and (3) the development of these two between-shock patterns without a history of reinforcement. Subjects developed either a pre-shock or a post-shock response pattern when only the bar was available. However, when both a bite tube, an operandum requiring an aggressive topography, and a recessed key, an operandum that did not require an aggressive topography, were provided, the post-shock pattern was observed in tube biting and the pre-shock pattern was observed in key pressing. Removal of the bite tube produced post-shock key responding similar to that observed when only the bar was available. The displacement of post-shock, aggression-motivated responding confirmed the confounding effect of shock-generated responding in negative reinforcement procedures, and suggests that the use of concurrent response alternatives would reduce such confounding.
根据负强化的固定间隔程序,对猴子的压杆(实验I)或按键(实验II和III)反应进行强化:在固定的时间间隔后,首次反应会定期终止一定时间的电击,这段时间被指定为强化期。在消退阶段,强化期内电击继续。仅电击产生的两种反应类型通过以下几点得以体现:(1)相对于无电击条件下,消退期间维持的反应水平;(2)在强化和消退条件下,两种电击间隔反应模式的稳定性;(3)这两种电击间隔模式在没有强化历史的情况下的发展。当只有杠杆可用时,实验对象会形成电击前或电击后的反应模式。然而,当同时提供咬管(一种需要攻击性行为的操作部件)和凹进式按键(一种不需要攻击性行为的操作部件)时,在咬管行为中观察到电击后模式,在按键行为中观察到电击前模式。移除咬管后,电击后按键反应与仅提供杠杆时观察到的反应相似。电击后、由攻击动机引发的反应的转移证实了负强化程序中电击产生的反应的混杂效应,并表明使用同时存在的反应选项将减少这种混杂。