Cherek D R, Thompson T, Heistad G T
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):113-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-113.
Pigeons responded in a two-key situation. Responses on the right key (food key) were reinforced with food presentation on a response-initiated fixed-interval schedule, (i.e., first response after a fixed period of time was reinforced); responses on the left key (target key) were reinforced on a fixed-ratio schedule (i.e., every nth response was reinforced) with the presentation of a target bird that could be attacked. When the interval value of the food reinforcement schedule was varied from 1 min to 5 min, both the rate of attack responding on the target bird and the rate of responding on the target key were a function of the interval value. Responding on the target key was not maintained by the stimulus change associated with target availability, and was successively extinguished and reconditioned by removing and returning the target bird to the restraining box. When food was delivered independently of behavior, responding on the target key either remained unchanged or decreased, but was not eliminated. Responding on the target key was not maintained in the absence of an intermittent schedule of food presentation.
鸽子在双按键情境中做出反应。对右侧按键(食物键)的反应,会在以反应启动的固定间隔时间表上呈现食物时得到强化(即,在固定时间段后的首次反应会得到强化);对左侧按键(目标键)的反应,会在固定比率时间表上(即,每第n次反应会得到强化)呈现一只可供攻击的目标鸟时得到强化。当食物强化时间表的间隔值从1分钟变化到5分钟时,对目标鸟的攻击反应速率和对目标键的反应速率都是间隔值的函数。对目标键的反应并非由与目标可用性相关的刺激变化所维持,并且通过将目标鸟移出并放回约束箱,该反应会相继消退和重新条件化。当食物独立于行为而给予时,对目标键的反应要么保持不变,要么减少,但不会消除。在没有间歇性食物呈现时间表的情况下,对目标键的反应无法维持。