Shimoff E
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):451-61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-451.
Response-independent pairings of a tone and a brief shock were superimposed on uncued avoidance responding in four groups of rhesus monkeys. For one group, tone presentations were immediately followed by an unavoidable electric shock; for the remaining groups, gaps of 5, 20, and 80 sec intervened between tone termination and shock delivery. These temporal values subsume paradigms usually treated as discrete procedures; the conditioned emotional response procedure (0-sec gap between tone and shock), trace procedure (5-sec gap) and safety-signal training (80-sec gap). Within each group, tone durations of 10, 20, 40, and 80 sec were examined. A response pattern marked by maximum response rate in the initial 5 sec of the tone followed by deceleration before shock was observed when shock immediately followed the tone, but not when gaps were interposed between the tone and shock. Response rates in the first 5 sec of the tone were a function of both tone duration and duration of the gap. When the gap was 0 to 5 sec, initial response rates were highest in longer duration tones; this relationship between tone duration and initial tone response rate was not observed for longer gaps.
在四组恒河猴的无提示回避反应中,叠加了与反应无关的纯音和短暂电击配对。对于一组,呈现纯音后立即给予不可避免的电击;对于其余几组,在纯音结束和电击施加之间插入5秒、20秒和80秒的间隔。这些时间值涵盖了通常被视为离散程序的范式;条件性情绪反应程序(纯音和电击之间间隔0秒)、痕迹程序(间隔5秒)和安全信号训练(间隔80秒)。在每组中,研究了10秒、20秒、40秒和80秒的纯音时长。当电击紧跟在纯音之后时,观察到一种反应模式,即在纯音开始的最初5秒内反应率最高,随后在电击前减速,但当纯音和电击之间插入间隔时则没有这种情况。纯音开始的最初5秒内的反应率是纯音时长和间隔时长的函数。当间隔为0至5秒时,较长时长纯音的初始反应率最高;对于较长的间隔,未观察到纯音时长与初始纯音反应率之间的这种关系。