Davis H, Kreuter C
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):277-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-277.
Three food-deprived Long-Evans rats were exposed to a non-discriminated shock avoidance procedure. Superimposed upon this operant avoidance baseline were periodic presentations of a conditioned stimulus that was paired with food, the unconditioned stimulus. These pairings resulted in increases in the rate of shock over that recorded when the conditioned stimulus was not present. A traditional suppression ratio failed to reveal any differential effect of the conditioned stimulus on the overall rate of avoidance responding, although all subjects showed a consistent pattern of pausing and postshock response bursts during presentations of the conditioned stimulus. When food was withheld during a final extinction phase, the conditioned stimulus ceased to occasion increases in shock rates and disruptive postshock response bursts were eliminated. An analysis of conditioned suppression procedures is proposed that stresses not only operant-Pavlovian or appetitive-aversive incompatibility, but also the manner in which the baseline schedule of reinforcement affects operant behavior changes that are elicited by the superimposed Pavlovian procedure.
三只禁食的Long-Evans大鼠接受了无差别电击回避程序。在此操作性回避基线之上,周期性地呈现与食物(无条件刺激)配对的条件刺激。这些配对导致电击率相较于条件刺激不存在时记录的电击率有所增加。传统的抑制率未能揭示条件刺激对总体回避反应率的任何差异效应,尽管所有受试者在条件刺激呈现期间都表现出一致的暂停和电击后反应爆发模式。在最后的消退阶段,如果不提供食物,条件刺激就不再引起电击率增加,电击后干扰性的反应爆发也会消除。本文提出了一种对条件抑制程序的分析,该分析不仅强调操作性-巴甫洛夫式或食欲-厌恶式不相容性,还强调强化基线程序影响由叠加的巴甫洛夫程序引发的操作性行为变化的方式。