• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种自然计划生育方法使用效果的随机前瞻性研究:中期报告

A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning: an interim report.

作者信息

Wade M E, McCarthy P, Abernathy J R, Harris G S, Danzer H C, Uricchio W A

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul 15;134(6):628-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90642-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(79)90642-2
PMID:463953
Abstract

Data accumulated to date from the Los Angeles study indicate that the total termination rate for 12 months from the beginning of the training period and from formal entry into the study was high for the ovulation method (OM), and symptothermal method (STM). Voluntary withdrawal was the highest single reason for termination in both methods. The 12 month voluntary withdrawal rate, measured from formal entry into the study, was significantly higher for OM users. Pregnancy rates measured from both the beginning of training and formal entry into the study were significantly higher for OM users than for STM users. Complete analysis of the data collected during the study is currently in progress. It is anticipated that some of the causes for the differences in pregnancy rates and withdrawal rates between the two methods can be identified.

摘要

洛杉矶研究迄今积累的数据表明,从训练期开始到正式进入研究的12个月内,排卵法(OM)和症状体温法(STM)的总终止率很高。自愿退出是两种方法中终止的最主要单一原因。从正式进入研究开始计算的12个月自愿退出率,OM使用者显著更高。从训练开始和正式进入研究时计算的妊娠率,OM使用者均显著高于STM使用者。目前正在对研究期间收集的数据进行全面分析。预计可以找出两种方法在妊娠率和退出率上存在差异的一些原因。

相似文献

1
A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning: an interim report.两种自然计划生育方法使用效果的随机前瞻性研究:中期报告
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul 15;134(6):628-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90642-2.
2
A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning.两种自然计划生育方法使用效果的随机前瞻性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct 15;141(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90597-4.
3
Comparative evaluation of two methods of natural family planning in Columbia.哥伦比亚两种自然计划生育方法的比较评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec 15;138(8):1142-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32781-8.
4
More about natural family planning.更多关于自然计划生育的内容。
Aust Fam Physician. 1983 Nov;12(11):786-92.
5
A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. I. The teaching phase.一项关于自然计划生育排卵法的前瞻性多中心试验。I. 教学阶段。
Fertil Steril. 1981 Aug;36(2):152-8.
6
Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.欧洲自然计划生育前瞻性多中心研究(1989 - 1992年):中期结果。欧洲自然计划生育研究小组
Adv Contracept. 1993 Dec;9(4):269-83.
7
Natural family planning: looking ahead.自然计划生育:展望未来。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):1979-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90556-0.
8
Pill-a-month as an oral contraceptive.每月服用一片的口服避孕药。
Egypt Popul Fam Plann Rev. 1972 Jun;5(1):1-17.
9
"Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.“自然计划生育”:得到天主教会支持的有效节育方法。
BMJ. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):723-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.723.
10
Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method.排卵法避孕失败的进一步分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):2054-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90581-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception.基于生育意识的避孕方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004860.pub2.
2
A thirty-month clinical experience in natural family planning.自然计划生育的30个月临床经验。
Am J Public Health. 1981 Nov;71(11):1255-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.11.1255.