Adv Contracept. 1993 Dec;9(4):269-83.
Since 1989 an international multicenter prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of natural family planning (NFP) methods in Europe has been conducted by the NFP Research Center at the University of Düsseldorf in collaboration with the European Zone of the International Federation for Family Life Promotion (IFFLP). Fourteen NFP-organizations from nine European countries participate in the study. Cycle data from women in the fertile age group are transferred to a special standard computer sheet by the respective organizations and forwarded at three-monthly intervals to the study center for analyses. To date, 10,045 cycles from 900 women aged between 19 and 54 years have been analyzed. This paper presents the pregnancy rate for the women aged between 19 and 45 years of age, who contributed 9284 cycles. In the analyses the cycles were subdivided into two categories consequent to sexual practices during the fertile phase: group I (NFP only--4277 cycles) use only NFP to avoid a pregnancy; group II (FA/mix--5007 cycles) where barrier methods or coitus interruptus during the fertile phase, at least in some cycles, were used to avoid a pregnancy. The women used different clinical indicators such as basal body temperature (BBT), cervical mucus, calculations, cyclical cervical changes or combinations of these to determine the beginning and the end of the fertile phase necessitating a further division into four subgroups, A, B, C, D, and different efficiency rates for each of these groups. In group A (symptothermal method, double check) 15 unintended pregnancies (UIP) occurred in 7404 cycles, giving a pregnancy rate of 2.4 Pearl Index (PI); in group B (muco-thermal method) there were 12 UIP in 1352 cycles with a pregnancy rate of 10.6 (PI); in group C (mucus to detect the beginning and mucus and BBT to determine the end of the fertile phase) there was one UIP in 434 cycles, and in group D (mucus method only) there was one IUP in 70 cycles. The numbers in group C and D are too small to calculate a pregnancy rate (PI). No pregnancy was observed in women over 40 years of age. Our conclusion from these preliminary results is that in the continent of Europe, the symptothermal method when used with periodic abstinence (NFP only = group I) and fertility awareness with the use of barriers during the fertile phase (FA/mix = group II) are effective methods of family planning.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
自1989年以来,杜塞尔多夫大学的自然计划生育研究中心与国际家庭生活促进联合会欧洲区合作,开展了一项国际多中心前瞻性研究,以评估自然计划生育(NFP)方法在欧洲的有效性和可接受性。来自9个欧洲国家的14个NFP组织参与了该研究。各组织将育龄妇女的周期数据录入一张特殊的标准电脑表格,并每三个月将数据转发至研究中心进行分析。迄今为止,已对900名年龄在19至54岁之间的女性的10,045个周期进行了分析。本文呈现了19至45岁女性的妊娠率,她们贡献了9284个周期。在分析中,根据排卵期的性行为将周期分为两类:第一组(仅NFP——4277个周期)仅使用NFP来避免怀孕;第二组(屏障法/混合法——5007个周期)在排卵期至少在某些周期使用屏障法或体外射精来避免怀孕。这些女性使用不同的临床指标,如基础体温(BBT)、宫颈黏液、计算方法、周期性宫颈变化或这些方法的组合,来确定排卵期的开始和结束,这使得需要进一步分为四个亚组,A、B、C、D,且每组有不同的有效率。在A组(症状体温法,双重检查)中,7404个周期中有15例意外怀孕(UIP),妊娠率为2. Pearl指数(PI);在B组(黏液体温法)中,1352个周期中有12例UIP,妊娠率为10.6(PI);在C组(用黏液检测排卵期开始,用黏液和BBT确定排卵期结束)中,434个周期中有1例UIP,在D组(仅黏液法)中,70个周期中有1例IUP。C组和D组的数据量太小,无法计算妊娠率(PI)。40岁以上的女性未观察到怀孕情况。从这些初步结果得出的结论是,在欧洲大陆,将症状体温法与定期禁欲(仅NFP = 第一组)以及在排卵期使用屏障法的生育期监测(屏障法/混合法 = 第二组)结合使用是有效的计划生育方法。(摘要截选至400字)