Mendenhall R C, Tarlov A R, Girard R A, Michel J K, Radecki S E
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Aug;91(2):275-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-2-275.
A nationwide study of practitioners in 24 medical and surgical specialties was conducted by the University of Southern California School of Medicine, Division of Research in Medical Education. In this second report of a series presenting findings for internal medicine, general internal medicine and 10 subspecialties of internal medicine are compared using a care classification scheme designed for the study. On the basis of characteristics of the individual patient encounter, this care classification scheme distinguishes several dimensions associated with the concept of primary care. Five empirically derived types of care rather than a simple "primary" or "non-primary" dichotomy are described, and the distributions of each type for the 11 subspecialties examined are noted. Types of care (according to the care classification) are examined by the time per patient, the complexity of physician services, the severity and chronicity of problems, and the degree of specialization associated with providing different types of care. Estimates of the number of annual encounters, and the number of annual encounters for three of the five types of care, with the proportion of each accounted for by each subspecialty, are given.
南加州大学医学院医学教育研究部对24个医学和外科学科的从业者进行了一项全国性研究。在这个系列报告的第二篇中,我们使用为该研究设计的护理分类方案,对内科、普通内科和内科的10个亚专科的研究结果进行了比较。根据个体患者诊疗的特征,该护理分类方案区分了与初级护理概念相关的几个维度。描述了从经验中得出的五种护理类型,而不是简单的“初级”或“非初级”二分法,并记录了所研究的11个亚专科中每种类型的分布情况。根据护理分类对护理类型进行了以下方面的考察:每位患者的诊疗时间、医生服务的复杂性、问题的严重程度和慢性病情况,以及提供不同类型护理的专业化程度。给出了每年诊疗次数的估计值,以及五种护理类型中的三种每年的诊疗次数,以及每个亚专科在每种护理类型中所占的比例。