Harris R W, Goldstein D P
Audiology. 1979 May-Jun;18(3):253-62. doi: 10.3109/00206097909081527.
Hearing-aid-processed speech recorded in reverberant and nonreverberant environments was ranked utilizing quality judgment and speech discrimination tasks. 21 normally hearing and 20 hearing-impaired listeners ranked the hearing-aid-processed speech. Quality judgments in reverberant environments may yield important information with respect to hearing aid selection. In contrast, speech discrimination rankings in a nonreverberant environment appeared to be similar to the speech discrimination rankings obtained in the reverberant condition.
在混响和非混响环境中录制的经助听器处理的语音，通过质量判断和言语辨别任务进行了排序。21名听力正常的听众和20名听力受损的听众对经助听器处理的语音进行了排序。混响环境中的质量判断可能会产生有关助听器选择的重要信息。相比之下，非混响环境中的言语辨别排序似乎与在混响条件下获得的言语辨别排序相似。
