Suppr超能文献

配对比较法在助听器中的应用。

Application of paired-comparison methods to hearing AIDS.

作者信息

Amlani Amyn M, Schafer Erin C

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Texas, PO Box 305010, Denton, TX 76203, USA.

出版信息

Trends Amplif. 2009 Dec;13(4):241-59. doi: 10.1177/1084713809352908.

Abstract

The method of paired comparisons was introduced into the hearing aid literature nearly 50 years ago. Over time, studies have found paired comparisons to be sensitive, valid, and reliable in determining either the perceptual difference or relative ranking among hearing aids and electroacoustic characteristics. With the increasing number of adjustable electroacoustic parameters in today's digital hearing aids-and the lack of procedural guidelines necessary to fit many of them-the method of paired comparisons provides the clinician with the ability to compare different devices, electroacoustic characteristics, memory settings, or combinations of these variables under the listener's everyday listening conditions. Furthermore, this procedure provides the clinician with the ability to individualize the prescriptive approach-which is predicated mainly on hearing threshold data and listening in quiet-so that a combination of parameters can be set to optimize the user's listening needs in a given environment. In this article, the authors present an overview of the theoretical principle supporting this procedure, the various paired-comparison strategies and associated approaches, the advantages of this method, and recommended procedures for implementing the method of paired comparisons in the fitting of today's sophisticated hearing aids.

摘要

配对比较法近50年前就被引入助听器文献中。随着时间的推移,研究发现配对比较法在确定助听器和电声特性之间的感知差异或相对排名方面是敏感、有效且可靠的。随着当今数字助听器中可调节电声参数数量的增加,以及缺乏适配其中许多参数所需的程序指南,配对比较法使临床医生能够在听众的日常聆听条件下比较不同的设备、电声特性、记忆设置或这些变量的组合。此外,该程序使临床医生能够个性化规定性方法(该方法主要基于听力阈值数据并在安静环境中聆听),以便可以设置参数组合以在给定环境中优化用户的聆听需求。在本文中,作者概述了支持该程序的理论原理、各种配对比较策略及相关方法、该方法的优点,以及在适配当今复杂助听器时实施配对比较法的推荐程序。

相似文献

1
Application of paired-comparison methods to hearing AIDS.
Trends Amplif. 2009 Dec;13(4):241-59. doi: 10.1177/1084713809352908.
3
Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):768-78. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.3.
5
Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.
Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 15;20:2331216516631741. doi: 10.1177/2331216516631741.
6
An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
Ear Hear. 2008 Apr;29(2):199-213. doi: 10.1097/aud.0b013e318164531f.
7
Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):159-72. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120364.13671.e2.
8
Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
Trends Amplif. 2001 Jun;5(2):35-68. doi: 10.1177/108471380100500202.

引用本文的文献

2
3
Preferred Strength of Noise Reduction for Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231211437. doi: 10.1177/23312165231211437.
5
Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark.
Audiol Res. 2023 Apr 12;13(2):254-270. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13020023.
6
The Collaboration between Hearing Aid Users and Artificial Intelligence to Optimize Sound.
Semin Hear. 2021 Aug;42(3):282-294. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735135. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
10
Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519837124. doi: 10.1177/2331216519837124.

本文引用的文献

4
Interactive fitting of multiple algorithms implemented in the same digital hearing aid.
Int J Audiol. 2007 Jul;46(7):388-97. doi: 10.1080/14992020701261421.
6
Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
Int J Audiol. 2005 Feb;44(2):92-101. doi: 10.1080/14992020500031090.
8
Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
Int J Audiol. 2003 Sep;42(6):319-26. doi: 10.3109/14992020309101324.
9
Quality judgment in hearing aid selection.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1960 Aug;25:259-66. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2503.259.
10
SEMANTIC COMPONENTS OF THE QUALITY OF PROCESSED SPEECH.
J Speech Hear Res. 1964 Dec;7:310-23. doi: 10.1044/jshr.0704.310.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验