Sutton R, Citron P
Br Heart J. 1979 May;41(5):600-12. doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.5.600.
A fundamental description of pacemaker systems which are commercially available or in clinical validation is given as a background for their application in a series of 62 consecutive patients presenting over a period of 1 year for permanent cardiac pacing. The patients (23 (37%) sick sinus syndrome, 38 (61%) atrioventricular block, and 1 ventricular tachycardia) were studied electrophysiologically and haemodynamically to allow the appropriate application of a pacemaker system. In sick sinus syndrome, 8 patients had permanent atrial pacing, 14 ventricular pacing, and 1 atrioventricular sequential pacing; in atrioventricular block, 8 patients had atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing and the remaining 30 had ventricular pacing. A high incidence of atrial fibrillation, 9 patients, and abnormal sinus node function, 15 patients, precluded wider use of atrial synchrony. The results show benefit in acute haemodynamic studies of using systems including atrial sensing and/or pacing, and with greater availability of atrioventricular sequential and still more advanced pacemakers with dual sensing as well as dual pacing the majority of patients may be offered this benefit.
本文对市售或正在进行临床验证的起搏器系统进行了基本描述,作为其在连续62例患者中应用的背景资料。这62例患者在1年时间内前来接受永久性心脏起搏治疗。对患者(23例(37%)病态窦房结综合征、38例(61%)房室传导阻滞和1例室性心动过速)进行了电生理和血流动力学研究,以便合理应用起搏器系统。在病态窦房结综合征患者中,8例采用永久性心房起搏,14例采用心室起搏,1例采用房室顺序起搏;在房室传导阻滞患者中,8例采用心房同步心室抑制起搏,其余30例采用心室起搏。房颤发生率较高(9例)以及窦房结功能异常(15例)使得心房同步功能无法更广泛应用。结果表明,在急性血流动力学研究中,使用包括心房感知和/或起搏功能的系统具有益处,并且随着房室顺序起搏器以及更先进的具有双感知和双起搏功能起搏器的更多应用,大多数患者可能会从中受益。