Suppr超能文献

联合医学图书馆辅助人员的分类:一项案例研究。

Classification of support staff in a consortium medical library: a case study.

作者信息

Pollak S, Lyders R A

出版信息

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Apr;67(2):232-8.

Abstract

A representative committee of Houston Academy of Medicine-Texas Medical Center Library staff and faculty, under the direction of the library administration, successfully redesigned a job classification system for the library's nonprofessional staff. In the new system all nonprofessionals are assigned to one of five grade levels, each with a corresponding salary range. To determine its appropriate grade level each job is analyzed and assigned a numerical value using a point system based on a set of five factors, each of which is assigned a relative number of points. The factors used to measure jobs are: education and experience, complexity of work, administrative accountability, manual skill, and contact with users. Each factor is described according to degrees, so that a job can be given partial credit for a factor. An advisory staff classification committee now participates in the ongoing administration of the classification system.

摘要

在图书馆管理层的指导下,由休斯顿医学院 - 德克萨斯医学中心图书馆工作人员和教员组成的一个代表性委员会,成功地重新设计了该图书馆非专业工作人员的工作分类系统。在新系统中,所有非专业人员被分配到五个等级之一,每个等级都有相应的薪资范围。为了确定其适当的等级,每个工作岗位都要进行分析,并使用基于五个因素的评分系统赋予一个数值,每个因素都被赋予了相对的分数。用于衡量工作岗位的因素包括:教育程度和经验、工作复杂性、行政责任、手工技能以及与用户的接触。每个因素都按程度进行描述,以便一个工作岗位可以因某个因素获得部分分数。一个顾问性的员工分类委员会现在参与该分类系统的日常管理。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验