Mims D H
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Apr;67(2):239-44.
The increased attention being given to an examination in the Medical Library Association certification process prompted a study of a group taking the examination under the old (1964 revision) code. Completed questionnaires were received from fifty-three of the sixty-five persons who took the examination in 1975 and 1976. Backgrounds of individuals varied, especially in years of experience. The majority of those responding had worked in both health sciences and other libraries. Experience in health sciences libraries was reported by 92% of those replying. A number of reasons for seeking MLA certification were given. Problems in being able to take MLA-approved courses prompted the choice of the examination process. Preparation for the examination was chiefly by self-directed study. Continuing education courses were considered as of greater value for professional development than as help on the examination. The examination was rated "moderately difficult" by 57% of those responding. Opinions were expressed on the skills and areas of expertise which were considered by this group to be important in an examination for professional competence.
医学图书馆协会认证过程中对考试的关注度不断提高,促使人们对一组按照旧版(1964年修订版)规则参加考试的人员进行了研究。在1975年和1976年参加考试的65人中,有53人提交了完整的调查问卷。个人背景各不相同,尤其是工作年限。大多数回复者都曾在健康科学图书馆和其他图书馆工作过。92%的回复者表示有在健康科学图书馆工作的经历。他们给出了一些寻求MLA认证的原因。参加MLA认可课程存在困难促使他们选择考试途径。考试准备主要是通过自主学习。继续教育课程被认为对职业发展的价值更大,而不是对考试有帮助。57%的回复者认为考试“难度适中”。该组人员就他们认为在专业能力考试中重要的技能和专业领域表达了意见。