Darling L
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1973 Oct;61(4):375-86.
The Medical Library Association's certification plan, never of real significance in employment and promotion practices in health sciences librarianship, does not reflect the many changes which have occurred in swift progression since adoption of the code in 1949. Solutions to the problems which have accumulated since then are sought in a brief examination of trends in credentialing and certification in the health professions and in the library field, both general and special. Emphasis is given to the historical development of provisions in the MLA Code for the Training and Certification of Medical Librarians, the limited opportunity for practical implementation of most of the provisions, the importance of the code in stimulating the Association's educational programs, the impact of the Medical Library Assistance Act, Regional Medical Programs, and increases in demand for health information on manpower requirements for health science libraries, the specific dissatisfactions MLA members have expressed over certification, and the role of the Ad Hoc Committee to Develop a New Certification Code.
医学图书馆协会的认证计划在健康科学图书馆事业的就业和晋升实践中从未具有实际意义,它未能反映出自1949年采用该准则以来迅速发生的诸多变化。通过简要审视健康专业领域以及图书馆领域(包括一般领域和特殊领域)的资质认定和认证趋势,来寻求解决自那时起积累的问题的办法。重点阐述了医学图书馆协会准则中关于医学图书馆员培训和认证条款的历史发展、大多数条款实际实施的机会有限、该准则在推动协会教育项目方面的重要性、《医学图书馆援助法》、区域医疗项目以及健康信息需求增加对健康科学图书馆人力需求的影响、医学图书馆协会成员对认证所表达的具体不满,以及制定新认证准则特别委员会的作用。