Marby M, Alexander-Williams J, Buchmann P, Arabi Y, Kappas A, Minervini S, Gatehouse D, Keighley M R
Dis Colon Rectum. 1979 Jul-Aug;22(5):308-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02609311.
A prospective randomized trial has compared manual dilatation of the anus (MDA)during general anesthesia with lateral subcutaneous spincterotomy (LSS) during local anesthesia for the management of anal fissure in 156 patients. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and symptoms. There was no difference in the duration of time off work or early complications of treatment but, four months after operation, 93 per cent claimed to have been improved by MDA compared with 78 per cent after LSS (P less than 0.05). Recurrent fissure was recorded in 13 patients after LSS (29 per cent) compared with four (10 per cent) after MDA (P less than 0.02). There was a significant reduction in anal pressure at four months (P less than 0.02) after MDA, (123 +/- 31 to 97 +/-33) and LSS (127 +/- 36 to 104 +/- 32), but the anal pressure remained unchanged by operation in all patients where pressures were measured with recurrent fissure. These data indicate that MDA gives better results than LSS for treatment of anal fissure and that successful treatment is associated with a reduction in anal pressure.
一项前瞻性随机试验比较了全身麻醉下肛门手法扩张术(MDA)与局部麻醉下侧方皮下括约肌切开术(LSS)治疗156例肛裂患者的效果。两组在年龄、性别和症状方面相似。两组患者的误工时间及治疗早期并发症无差异,但术后4个月,MDA组93%的患者称病情改善,而LSS组为78%(P<0.05)。LSS术后有13例(29%)出现肛裂复发,而MDA术后为4例(10%)(P<0.02)。MDA术后4个月(P<0.02)和LSS术后4个月肛门压力均显著降低(MDA组:123±31降至97±33;LSS组:127±36降至104±32),但在所有测量了复发性肛裂患者的肛门压力中,手术前后肛门压力均无变化。这些数据表明,对于肛裂的治疗,MDA比LSS效果更好,且成功的治疗与肛门压力降低相关。