• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[New tables for the determination of percentile loss of speech hearing].

作者信息

Boenninghaus H G, Röser D

出版信息

Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1973 Mar;52(3):153-61.

PMID:4698063
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
[New tables for the determination of percentile loss of speech hearing].[用于确定言语听力百分位数损失的新表格]
Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1973 Mar;52(3):153-61.
2
[The testing of Boenninghaus' and Röser's new tables for the determination of percentile hearing loss].[对用于确定百分位数听力损失的伯宁豪斯表和勒泽表的测试]
Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1973 Mar;52(3):161-4.
3
[Relationship between sound- and speech-hearing capacity in acoustic trauma patients].[声学创伤患者的声音和言语听力能力之间的关系]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1975 Oct 15;69(20):1086-8.
4
[Results of speech audiometry in acoustic trauma].[声创伤的言语测听结果]
Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol. 1968;102(3):152-7.
5
[Quantitative evaluation of hearing disorders in expert assessment. A recent recommendation for calculating the percentage of hearing loss].[专家评估中听力障碍的定量评估。近期关于计算听力损失百分比的建议]
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Jul;67(7):319-25.
6
Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.言语测听法中的一些方法学方面
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1984;21:1-25.
7
[Comparative computations in the determination of percentual hearing loss of subjects with acoustic trauma].[声学创伤患者听力损失百分比测定中的比较计算]
Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1971 Aug;50(8):532-43.
8
Relation between audiological findings and complaints by persons suffering from noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失患者的听力学检查结果与主诉之间的关系。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1971 Jul;32(7):447-52. doi: 10.1080/0002889718506487.
9
[Comparison between the sound threshold audiogram and a speech audiogram in subjects with hearing impairment due to noise].[噪声性听力损伤患者纯音听阈图与言语听阈图的比较]
Z Gesamte Hyg. 1968 Mar;14(3):165-9.
10
[Objective evaluation of distortions in hearing disorders].[听力障碍中畸变的客观评估]
Cesk Otolaryngol. 1971 Aug;20(4):172-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing CI Systems for Better Recognition of Soft Speech -the Concept of Broad-Range Mapping.优化连续统识别系统以更好地识别轻声语音——宽范围映射概念
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Oct 7;10(5):e70273. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70273. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
The Oldenburg Hearing Health Record (OHHR).奥尔登堡听力健康记录（OHHR）。
Sci Data. 2025 Sep 17;12(1):1546. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05884-y.
3
[Suitability of determining percentage hearing loss for monitoring cochlear implant rehabilitation].[确定听力损失百分比用于监测人工耳蜗康复的适用性]
HNO. 2023 Feb;71(2):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01257-8. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
4
The Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Provision With Hearing Aids in the Gutenberg Health Study.《古腾堡健康研究中听力损失的患病率和助听器的提供情况》
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Feb 17;120(Forthcoming):99-106. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0385.
5
Current audiological diagnostics.当前的听力学诊断
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/cto000148. eCollection 2017.
6
[Speech audiometry in expert assessment of hearing impairment].[听力减退专家评估中的言语测听法]
HNO. 2017 Mar;65(3):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0239-2.
7
[The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].[弗莱堡言语清晰度测试：德语国家言语测听的一个支柱]
HNO. 2016 Aug;64(8):540-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0150-x.
8
[On the underestimation of normal hearing].
HNO. 2015 May;63(5):380-2. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0009-6.
9
[Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].[新型安静环境下言语清晰度测试在后天性听力损失评估中的应用]
HNO. 2013 Jan;61(1):14-24. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2621-z.
10
[Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
HNO. 2011 Nov;59(11):1111-7. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2355-3.