Suppr超能文献

[专家评估中听力障碍的定量评估。近期关于计算听力损失百分比的建议]

[Quantitative evaluation of hearing disorders in expert assessment. A recent recommendation for calculating the percentage of hearing loss].

作者信息

Feldmann H

机构信息

Universitäts-Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik Münster.

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Jul;67(7):319-25.

PMID:3062285
Abstract

A short historical survey is given of grading the severity of hearing disorders and assessing the relevant disability for recompensation purposes according to the tables of Boenninghaus, Röser, and Feldmann. The present situation and the reasons giving rise to dissatisfaction with this procedure are analysed. They are the high threshold of 20% disability for recompensation, the rigidity of the tables, and the technical development of speech audiometry without concomitant adaptation of the tables. The following possible solutions are discussed and rejected: changing the tables, substituting speech audiometry by tone audiometry, speech audiometry with interfering noise, filtered speech audiometry, special bonus for recruitment. The following feasible solution is proposed: Retaining all tables in use up to this time, however, instead of using the sum of discrimination scores which simply adds the scores at 60, 80 and 100 dB SRL, weighting factors are introduced according to the formula [3 x (% at 60 dB) + 2 x (% at 80 dB) + 1 x (% at 100 dB)]: 2 The advantages and the effect of this procedure on calculating hearing loss and disability are discussed.

摘要

本文根据博宁豪斯、勒泽和费尔德曼的表格,对听力障碍严重程度分级及评估相关赔偿残疾情况进行了简短的历史回顾。分析了当前形势以及对此程序不满的原因。这些原因包括赔偿的残疾阈值高达20%、表格的僵化以及言语测听技术的发展而表格却未随之调整。讨论并否定了以下可能的解决方案:更改表格、用纯音测听替代言语测听、有干扰噪声的言语测听、滤波言语测听、招聘特别津贴。提出了以下可行的解决方案:保留至今使用的所有表格,然而,不是使用简单相加60、80和100 dB SRL处得分的辨别得分总和,而是根据公式[3×(60 dB处的%)+2×(80 dB处的%)+1×(100 dB处的%)]引入加权因子:2 讨论了该程序在计算听力损失和残疾方面的优点及效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验