Suppr超能文献

腹股沟疝修补术全身麻醉与局部麻醉的比较。

Comparison between general and local anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

作者信息

Makuria T, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley M R

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979 Jul;61(4):291-4.

Abstract

A prospective study of 104 cases has been carried out to compare the use of local and general anaesthesia for the elective repair of groin hernias. There were no apparent disadvantages in using a local anaesthetic procedure. Patients having local anaesthetic herniorrhaphy required postoperative analgesics and antiemetics significantly less often and also returned home sooner (3.2 days) than patients having a general anaesthetic (4.1 days). These findings argue strongly in favour of local anaesthesia as a suitable alternative to general anaesthesia for repair of groin hernias.

摘要

一项针对104例患者的前瞻性研究已开展,以比较局部麻醉和全身麻醉在择期腹股沟疝修补术中的应用情况。使用局部麻醉手术并无明显弊端。接受局部麻醉疝修补术的患者术后使用镇痛药和止吐药的频率显著更低,而且比接受全身麻醉的患者更早(3.2天)出院(全身麻醉患者为4.1天)。这些发现有力地支持了局部麻醉可作为腹股沟疝修补术中全身麻醉的合适替代方案。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验