Suppr超能文献

助听器的选择:分析与观点

Hearing aid selection. An analysis and point of view.

作者信息

Byrne D

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol. 1979 Sep;105(9):519-25. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1979.00790210017004.

Abstract

Hearing aid selection and hearing aid evaluation are related, but separate, processes. Adequate selection must precede evaluation, which can only be applied to a few of the limitless amplification possibilities. I discuss the theoretical principles of aid selection and illustrate their application by reference to aid selection procedures developed in the National Acoustic Laboratories, Australia. Unless selection is arbitrary, a theoretical method is being used even if not recognized or applied consistently. It is argued that casual methods cannot be adequate and should be replaced by the adoption of theoretical procedures that are explicit, systematic, comprehensive, and subject to critical examination and refinement.

摘要

助听器的选择和助听器的评估是相关但又相互独立的过程。充分的选择必须先于评估,因为评估只能应用于无数放大可能性中的少数几种。我将讨论助听器选择的理论原则,并通过参考澳大利亚国家声学实验室制定的助听器选择程序来说明其应用。除非选择是随意的,否则即使没有被一致认可或应用,也在使用一种理论方法。有人认为,随意的方法是不够的,应该被采用明确、系统、全面且经过严格审查和完善的理论程序所取代。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验