Manschreck T C, Maher B A, Rucklos M E, White M T
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Jun;134:595-601. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.6.595.
Previous research has resulted in inconsistent findings regarding the predictability of schizophrenic speech samples. It was hypothesized that the predictability of schizophrenic speech varies as a function of clinically manifest thought disorder. In an experiment based on the Cloze procedure, raters were asked to predict ten passages of schizophrenic speech and eight passages of normal speech under conditions of fourth- and fifth-word deletion. Differences emerged between the samples only for the fifth-word deletion procedure. When the schizophrenic samples were grouped according to the presence of thought disorder, thought-disordered speech was significantly less predictable than normal and non-thought disordered schizophrenic speech. Furthermore, non-thought-disordered schizophrenic speech was no less predictable than normal speech. It is concluded that schizophrenia should be more carefully defined and that thought disorder should be routinely assessed in future investigations.
先前的研究在精神分裂症言语样本的可预测性方面得出了不一致的结果。据推测,精神分裂症言语的可预测性会因临床表现出的思维障碍而有所不同。在一项基于完形填空程序的实验中,要求评分者在第四和第五个单词被删除的情况下,预测十段精神分裂症言语和八段正常言语。样本之间的差异仅出现在第五个单词删除程序中。当根据思维障碍的存在对精神分裂症样本进行分组时,有思维障碍的言语的可预测性明显低于正常言语和无思维障碍的精神分裂症言语。此外,无思维障碍的精神分裂症言语的可预测性并不低于正常言语。研究得出结论,精神分裂症的定义应更加谨慎,并且在未来的研究中应常规评估思维障碍。