Suppr超能文献

五种不同应力测试方法在冠状动脉疾病心电图诊断中的比较。与冠状动脉造影的相关性。

Comparison of five different stress testing methods in the ECG diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Correlation with coronary arteriography.

作者信息

Manca C, Bianchi G, Effendy F N, Bolognesi R, Cucchini F, Visioli O

出版信息

Cardiology. 1979;64(5):325-32. doi: 10.1159/000170630.

Abstract

Five different stress testing methods: bicycle ergometer exercise (BE), treadmill exercise (TD), isoproterenol infusion test (IPN), dopamine infusion test (DPM), and atrial pacing (AP), were performed on 90 male patients who underwent coronary arteriography. Ischemic S-T segment depression of 1.0 mm or greater was used as the criterion for a positive test. Within the group of 56 subjects having significant coronary artery disease (CAD) the diagnostic sensitivity of the single tests was as follows: 64.3% for BE, 66.1% for TD, 69.6% for IPN, 41.1% for DPM, 75.0% for AP. For the 34 subjects with no CAD the folowing specificity was found: 88.2% for BE and for TD, 82.3% for IPN, 85.3% for DPM, 63.8% for AP. When the results of the different tests were combined, it was seen that the association of an ergometric test with IPN enhanced the sensitivity of the exercise test (p less than 0.05) without significantly decreasing the specificity.

摘要

对90例接受冠状动脉造影的男性患者进行了五种不同的应激测试方法:自行车测力计运动(BE)、跑步机运动(TD)、异丙肾上腺素输注试验(IPN)、多巴胺输注试验(DPM)和心房起搏(AP)。以缺血性S-T段压低1.0毫米或更大作为测试阳性的标准。在56例患有严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的受试者组中,单项测试的诊断敏感性如下:BE为64.3%,TD为66.1%,IPN为69.6%,DPM为41.1%,AP为75.0%。对于34例无CAD的受试者,发现以下特异性:BE和TD为88.2%,IPN为82.3%,DPM为85.3%,AP为63.8%。当将不同测试的结果合并时,可以看到测力计测试与IPN联合可提高运动测试的敏感性(p小于0.05),而不会显著降低特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验