Suppr超能文献

血小板计数法与血小板蛋白法测定血小板单胺氧化酶活性的比较。

Comparison of platelet count and platelet protein methods for determination of platelet MAO activity.

作者信息

Jackman H, Arora R, Meltzer H Y

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 1979 Aug 15;96(1-2):15-23. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(79)90047-0.

Abstract

Platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in 10 normal volunteers was studied as a function of platelet protein or electronically-determined platelet counts. Comparisons of the two methods were made for samples assayed on the same day as well as one week later. The MAO activities resulting from both methods were significantly correlated and reproducible but the results of the platelet count method were, in most instances, slightly but significantly more reliable than the platelet protein method. The relevance of these results to the controversy concerning platelet MAO activity in schizophrenia is discussed.

摘要

对10名正常志愿者的血小板单胺氧化酶(MAO)活性进行了研究,将其作为血小板蛋白或电子测定的血小板计数的函数。对同一天以及一周后检测的样本进行了两种方法的比较。两种方法得出的MAO活性显著相关且具有可重复性,但在大多数情况下,血小板计数法的结果比血小板蛋白法略微但显著更可靠。讨论了这些结果与精神分裂症中血小板MAO活性争议的相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验