Nathan S P, Lebowitz M D, Knudson R J
Chest. 1979 Oct;76(4):384-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.76.4.384.
To address the questions of whether three or five maneuvers for forced vital capacity (FVC) should be required for adequate spirometric testing and whether the largest or mean values for FVC and the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) should be used for analysis, we analyzed spirometric data obtained from approximately 3,000 people for each of three consecutive years. The following four algorithms for selection of data were tested: (1) the average of the best two of five measurements; (2) the average of the best two of the first three; (3) the best of five; and (4) the best of the first three. There were no significant differences between any two algorithms within a given year and no differences between any two years for any algorithm. We conclude that there is little to be gained by requiring more than three maneuvers for FVC or in using values other than the largest FEV1 and FVC.
为了解决肺量计测试是否需要三次或五次用力肺活量(FVC)操作以及FVC和第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)应使用最大值还是平均值进行分析的问题,我们分析了连续三年每年从大约3000人身上获得的肺量计数据。测试了以下四种数据选择算法:(1)五次测量中最佳两次的平均值;(2)前三组中最佳两次的平均值;(3)五次中的最佳值;(4)前三组中的最佳值。在给定年份内,任何两种算法之间没有显著差异,并且对于任何算法,任何两年之间也没有差异。我们得出结论,要求进行超过三次FVC操作或使用除最大FEV1和FVC之外的值几乎没有什么益处。