Robinson F C, Robinson S W, Williams L J
J Natl Med Assoc. 1979 Jun;71(6):593-8.
The court-ordered sterilization of a normal 18-year-old black female in North Carolina focused attention on the unfortunate impact of eugenic statutes that allow sterilization as a method of social control. The existence of these laws in many states allows misapplication and abuse of authority which, not infrequently, is directed liberally to blacks and other minority groups.Eugenic sterilization is, at this time, a legally accepted form of "medical treatment." The justification of such sterilization is the vague concept that the presumed "mentally deficient" individual is probably a potential parent of socially inadequate offspring who would likewise be socially inadequate.Since there never has been factual substantiation of whether the sterilization of these individuals will diminish the incidence of mental retardation, it is necessary to focus attention on the concept of eugenic sterilization and point out its many fallacies.
北卡罗来纳州一名18岁正常黑人女性被法庭强制绝育,这一事件让人们将注意力聚焦在优生法规带来的不幸影响上,这些法规允许将绝育作为一种社会控制手段。许多州存在此类法律,这使得权力被滥用,而且这种滥用常常针对黑人及其他少数群体。此时,优生绝育是一种法律认可的“医疗手段”。这种绝育的理由是一个模糊的概念,即假定的“智力缺陷”个体很可能会生育出社会适应能力不足的后代,而这些后代同样也会在社会适应方面存在问题。由于从未有事实依据证明对这些个体进行绝育是否会降低智力缺陷的发生率,因此有必要关注优生绝育这一概念,并指出其诸多谬误。