Vessey M P, Johnson B, Donnelly J
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1974 May;28(2):104-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.28.2.104.
A prospective study is in progress at 17 family planning clinics to try to provide a balanced view of the beneficial and harmful effects of different methods of contraception. During follow-up, data about pregnancies and their outcome, hospital visits, and changes in contraceptive practices are collected from the participants in the study at routine clinic visits, by postal questionnaire, or by home visiting. Whenever a hospital admission is reported, a copy of the discharge letter or summary is obtained. In the present investigation, the reliability of reporting of pregnancies and their outcome and hospital admissions by 1,915 subjects attending two Scottish clinics was checked by comparing information obtained by the routine survey methods with maternity and hospital inpatient records maintained by the Scottish Home and Health Department. It was found that no births, miscarriages, terminations of pregnancy or admissions for sterilization had been missed in the prospective study while 90% of all other hospital admissions were reported. No evidence was obtained of any important variation in the reliability of reporting between users of different methods of contraception or between different methods of collecting the follow-up information.
一项前瞻性研究正在17家计划生育诊所进行,旨在全面评估不同避孕方法的利弊。在随访期间,通过定期门诊、邮寄问卷或家访的方式,收集研究参与者关于怀孕及其结果、就医情况以及避孕方式变化的数据。一旦报告有住院情况,就会获取出院小结或摘要。在本次调查中,通过将常规调查方法获取的信息与苏格兰家庭与卫生部保存的产妇及医院住院记录进行对比,检验了1915名在两家苏格兰诊所就诊的受试者报告怀孕及其结果和住院情况的可靠性。结果发现,在前瞻性研究中没有遗漏任何出生、流产、终止妊娠或绝育手术住院情况,而其他所有住院情况的报告率为90%。没有证据表明不同避孕方法使用者之间或不同随访信息收集方法之间在报告可靠性方面存在任何重大差异。