Herrmann J B, Korgaonkar M, Cutler B S
Arch Surg. 1979 Sep;114(9):1049-51. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370330071013.
A series of 32 patients examined by two different noninvasive techniques in two different laboratories and by cerebral angiography were retrospectively studied. Significant differences in ophthalmic artery pressures as measured by oculopneumoplethysmography (OPPG), and significant delays in ocular pulse arrival time combined with characteristic recorded bruits as determined by oculoplethysmography/carotid phonoangiography (OPG/CPA) were considered as an index of carotid stenosis. Cerebral angiography was performed on all 32 patients to confirm or refute the diagnosis suggested by noninvasive testing. In this selected group of patients with difficult diagnostic problems, only 67% of significant (greater than 50% diameter) stenoses were detected by OPPG, and only 58% by OPG/CPA. Combining OPPG and OPG/CPA increased the probability of detecting a greater than 50% diameter stenosis to 92%.
对32例患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在两个不同实验室接受了两种不同的非侵入性技术检查,并进行了脑血管造影。眼体积描记法(OPPG)测量的眼动脉压力存在显著差异,眼体积描记法/颈动脉血管音造影(OPG/CPA)测定的眼脉搏到达时间显著延迟并伴有特征性记录的杂音,这些被视为颈动脉狭窄的指标。对所有32例患者进行了脑血管造影,以证实或反驳非侵入性检测所提示的诊断。在这组诊断问题较难的选定患者中,OPPG仅检测出67%的显著(直径大于50%)狭窄,OPG/CPA仅检测出58%。将OPPG和OPG/CPA结合使用可将检测直径大于50%狭窄的概率提高到92%。