Duncanson R L, St Geme J W
Calif Med. 1968 Aug;109(2):112-5.
Two hundred and eighteen urine specimens were cultured in duplicate to compare the reliability of a miniature culture technique with a more standard, calibrated loop-method for quantitative urinary bacteriology. The new method appears to be reliable: the rate of false negative results was 2.5 percent and of false positive 3.6 percent. The correlation with the standard method was best in the ranges of 0 to 10,000 and greater than 100,000 colonies per milliliter. The technique is simple, quick, and easily applicable to the physician's office laboratory.
对218份尿液标本进行了重复培养,以比较一种微型培养技术与一种更标准的、经过校准的定量尿细菌学环法的可靠性。新方法似乎可靠:假阴性结果率为2.5%,假阳性结果率为3.6%。在每毫升0至10,000个菌落以及大于100,000个菌落的范围内,与标准方法的相关性最佳。该技术简单、快速,且易于应用于医生办公室实验室。