Duke B O
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;39(2):179-86.
Previous work on monkeys and on human volunteers led to the development of a schedule of diethylcarbamazine dosage suitable for the chemoprophylaxis of loiasis. In several parts of Africa where this chemoprophylaxis is practised against Loa loa, infections with Onchocerca volvulus are also common. Attempts were therefore made to determine whether diethylcarbamazine has any prophylactic action against the latter parasite by making use of chimpanzees exposed to experimental infections, and also by using biopsy techniques to study the fate of infective larvae inoculated into volunteers.Both experimental methods proved more difficult to apply in O. volvulus infections than had been the case with L. loa, but evidence was obtained that diethylcarbamazine is not an effective chemoprophylactic for O. volvulus.Further experiments were then carried out with suramin and with melarsonyl potassium (Mel W). Although both gave some evidence of partial prophylactic activity, their use for this purpose is at present neither practical nor safe.
先前对猴子和人类志愿者开展的研究促成了一种适合用于预防罗阿丝虫病的乙胺嗪给药方案的制定。在非洲的几个实行针对罗阿丝虫进行这种化学预防措施的地区,盘尾丝虫感染也很常见。因此,研究人员尝试通过利用暴露于实验性感染的黑猩猩,以及通过活检技术来研究接种到志愿者体内的感染性幼虫的命运,以确定乙胺嗪对后一种寄生虫是否有任何预防作用。事实证明,这两种实验方法在盘尾丝虫感染中比在罗阿丝虫感染中更难应用,但已获得证据表明乙胺嗪对盘尾丝虫不是一种有效的化学预防药物。随后,研究人员又使用苏拉明和美拉胂钾(麦拉胂)进行了进一步实验。虽然两者都有一些部分预防活性的证据,但目前将它们用于这一目的既不实际也不安全。