Greisman S E, Hornick R B, Wagner H N, Woodward W E, Woodward T E
J Clin Invest. 1969 Apr;48(4):613-29. doi: 10.1172/JCI106020.
Volunteers infected with Salmonella typhosa develop a remarkable hyperreactivity to the pyrogenic and subjective toxic activities of homologous (S. typhos) and heterologous (Pseudomonas) endotoxins. The present studies quantitate this augmented reactivity and demonstrate by three differing approaches that significant tolerance to these endotoxins can be readily induced within the framework of the hyperreactive state. Thus, (a) tolerance induced before illness by repeated daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins remained demonstrable during overt illness, (b) daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins begun during overt illness evoked progressively increasing tolerance, and (c) continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin during illness rapidly induced a pyrogenic refractory state. Despite unequivocal activation of the endotoxin tolerance mechanisms by any of the above methods, the febrile and toxic course of typhoid fever proceeded unabated. Similarly, in other volunteers with Pasteurella tularensis infection, continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin evoked initial hyperreactive febrile and subjective toxic responses followed by rapid appearance of a pyrogenic refractory state without modification of the underlying clinical illness. These observations suggest that circulating endotoxin plays no major role in pathogenesis of the sustained fever and toxemia during typhoid fever and tularemia in man. The mechanisms responsible for the systemic hyperreactivity to endotoxin during typhoid fever and tularemia were further investigated. Low grade endotoxemia, nonspecific effects of tissue injury, impaired ability of the reticuloendothelial system to clear circulating endotoxin, and production of cytophilic antibodies capable of sensitizing leukocytes to endotoxin did not appear responsible. Inflammatory reactions to intradermal S. typhosa endotoxin increased significantly during typhoid fever. However, since no such dermal hyperreactivity developed to Pseudomonas endotoxin during typhoid fever nor to S. typhosa endotoxin during tularemia, the systemic hyperreactivity to bacterial endotoxins during typhoid fever and tularemia could not presently be ascribed to enhanced levels of acquired hypersensitivity.
感染伤寒沙门氏菌的志愿者对同源(伤寒沙门氏菌)和异源(假单胞菌)内毒素的致热和主观毒性活性表现出显著的高反应性。本研究对这种增强的反应性进行了定量,并通过三种不同的方法证明,在高反应性状态的框架内,可以很容易地诱导出对这些内毒素的显著耐受性。因此,(a)在疾病发作前通过每日重复静脉注射内毒素诱导的耐受性在明显疾病期间仍然可以检测到,(b)在明显疾病期间开始每日静脉注射内毒素会逐渐诱导出越来越高的耐受性,并且(c)在疾病期间持续静脉输注伤寒沙门氏菌内毒素会迅速诱导出致热不应性状态。尽管通过上述任何一种方法都明确激活了内毒素耐受机制,但伤寒热的发热和毒性病程并未减弱。同样,在其他感染土拉弗朗西斯菌的志愿者中,持续静脉输注伤寒沙门氏菌内毒素会引发最初的高反应性发热和主观毒性反应,随后迅速出现致热不应性状态,而潜在的临床疾病并未改变。这些观察结果表明,循环内毒素在人类伤寒热和兔热病期间持续发热和毒血症的发病机制中不起主要作用。对伤寒热和兔热病期间对内毒素的全身高反应性的机制进行了进一步研究。低度内毒素血症、组织损伤的非特异性影响、网状内皮系统清除循环内毒素的能力受损以及能够使白细胞对内毒素敏感的嗜细胞抗体的产生似乎都不是原因。在伤寒热期间,对皮内注射伤寒沙门氏菌内毒素的炎症反应显著增加。然而,由于在伤寒热期间对假单胞菌内毒素或在兔热病期间对伤寒沙门氏菌内毒素均未出现这种皮肤高反应性,目前无法将伤寒热和兔热病期间对细菌内毒素的全身高反应性归因于获得性超敏反应水平的提高。