Meager A, Graves H E, Shuttleworth J, Zucker N
Infect Immun. 1979 Aug;25(2):658-63. doi: 10.1128/iai.25.2.658-663.1979.
A survey of human diploid, aneusomic, transformed and tumor fibroblast or fibroblastoid cell lines for their capacity to produce interferon after polyriboinosinic acid:polycytidylic acid induction showed considerable variation in responsiveness. There was no apparent correlation between karyotype or phenotype and interferon production. Pretreating or "priming" the cells with human interferon generally led to increased yields of interferon after polyriboinosinic acid:polycytidylic acid induction in all cell lines tested. All the cells also showed the "super-induction" phenomenon, although to varying degrees. The combination of priming and superinduction conditions led to the production of very high yields of interferon in some cell lines, but in other lines, yields less than either the primed or superinduced amounts were found. A more limited survey of human cell lines for their capacity to produce interferon after Newcastle disease virus induction also showed that yields varied from line to line. However, there was little evidence to suggest that ability to produce interferon after Newcastle disease virus induction correlated with that after polyriboinosinic acid:polycytidylic acid induction.
对人二倍体、非整倍体、转化及肿瘤成纤维细胞或成纤维样细胞系在聚肌苷酸:聚胞苷酸诱导后产生干扰素的能力进行的一项调查显示,其反应性存在相当大的差异。核型或表型与干扰素产生之间没有明显的相关性。用人类干扰素对细胞进行预处理或“预刺激”,通常会使所有测试细胞系在聚肌苷酸:聚胞苷酸诱导后干扰素产量增加。所有细胞也都表现出“超诱导”现象,尽管程度不同。预刺激和超诱导条件的组合在某些细胞系中导致产生非常高产量的干扰素,但在其他细胞系中,产量低于单独预刺激或超诱导的量。对人类细胞系在新城疫病毒诱导后产生干扰素的能力进行的一项更有限的调查也表明,不同细胞系的产量各不相同。然而,几乎没有证据表明新城疫病毒诱导后产生干扰素的能力与聚肌苷酸:聚胞苷酸诱导后的能力相关。