Springer G F, Horton R E
J Clin Invest. 1969 Jul;48(7):1280-91. doi: 10.1172/JCI106094.
It was investigated whether or not the human blood group isoantibodies A and B could be induced by immunogenic stimuli via natural routes with a kind of antigenic substance to which all humans are commonly exposed, or if the appearance of these antibodies is independent of antigenic stimuli as has long been believed. Escherichia coli O(86), which possess high human blood group B and faint A activity in vitro, were fed to healthy humans and those with intestinal disorders. 80% of the sick individuals of blood group O and A responded with a significant rise of anti-B antibodies which was frequently de novo in infants; significant increase of anti-A isoantibodies among blood group O individuals was less frequent. Over one-third of the healthy individuals also had a significant isoantibody increase. Intestinal lesions favor isoantibody stimulation by intestinal bacteria; this view was supported by the study of control infants. Persons of blood group A responded more frequently with anti-B and anti-E. coli O(86) antibody production than those of blood group O. Isoantibody increase was accompanied with antibody rise against E. coli O(86). Inhalation of E. coli O(86) or blood group AH(O)-specific hog mucin also evoked isoantibodies. The induced isoantibodies were specifically inhibited by small amounts of human blood group substances. E. coli O(86)-induced anti-blood group antibodies in germ-free chickens and preexisting blood group antibodies in ordinary chickens were neutralized by intravenous injection of E. coli O(86) lipopolysaccharide. This study demonstrates that human isoantibodies A and B are readily elicited via physiological routes, by blood group-active E. coli, provided the genetically determined apparatus of the host is responsive. Antibodies against a person's own blood group were not formed. Interpretation of these results permits some careful generalizations as to the origin of so-called natural antibodies.
研究了人类血型同种抗体A和B是否可通过自然途径,由一种所有人普遍接触的抗原性物质经免疫原性刺激诱导产生,或者这些抗体的出现是否如长期以来所认为的那样与抗原性刺激无关。将体外具有高人类血型B活性和微弱A活性的大肠杆菌O(86)喂给健康人和患有肠道疾病的人。80%的O型和A型患病个体的抗B抗体显著升高,婴儿中这种情况常常是从头开始产生的;O型个体中抗A同种抗体的显著增加则较少见。超过三分之一的健康个体也有显著的同种抗体增加。肠道病变有利于肠道细菌刺激同种抗体产生;对照婴儿的研究支持了这一观点。A型血的人比O型血的人更频繁地产生抗B和抗大肠杆菌O(86)抗体。同种抗体增加伴随着针对大肠杆菌O(86)的抗体升高。吸入大肠杆菌O(86)或血型AH(O)特异性猪粘蛋白也会诱发同种抗体。少量人类血型物质可特异性抑制诱导产生的同种抗体。在无菌鸡中由大肠杆菌O(86)诱导产生的抗血型抗体以及普通鸡中预先存在的血型抗体,可通过静脉注射大肠杆菌O(86)脂多糖而被中和。这项研究表明,只要宿主的遗传决定机制有反应,人类同种抗体A和B很容易通过生理途径,由具有血型活性的大肠杆菌诱导产生。未形成针对个体自身血型的抗体。对这些结果的解释允许就所谓天然抗体的起源进行一些谨慎的归纳。