Dajda R
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Jun;33(2):138-41. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.2.138.
In this paper five variables are taken from the General Household Survey and the statistical technique of multidimensional scaling is used to estimate the relationships between the standard economic regions of England and Wales in terms of their self-reported morbidity. An estimate is then made of the proportion of resources that must be allocated to each region in order to eliminate the differences found. The five variables measuring longstanding illness; limiting longstanding illness; restricted activity; certificated absence; and general practitioner consultation were standardised, and input to a multidimensional scaling programme. This showed that the English regions were very similar to each other, although a morbidity continuum could be identified which corresponded to the North-South variation in socioeconomic conditions found in England. Wales, however, shows considerable difference from the English regions, a difference which cannot be explained purely in terms of the socioeconomic conditions in the region. For this reason a far more detailed investigation is proposed.
本文从综合住户调查中选取了五个变量,并运用多维尺度统计技术,根据自我报告的发病率来估算英格兰和威尔士各标准经济区域之间的关系。然后估算出为消除所发现的差异必须分配给每个区域的资源比例。对衡量长期疾病、限制性生活长期疾病、活动受限、证明缺勤和全科医生诊疗的五个变量进行了标准化处理,并输入到一个多维尺度程序中。结果表明,尽管可以确定一个发病率连续体,它与英格兰发现的社会经济状况的南北差异相对应,但英格兰各地区彼此非常相似。然而,威尔士与英格兰各地区存在相当大的差异,这种差异不能仅仅从该地区的社会经济状况来解释。因此,建议进行更详细的调查。