Jackson G L, Thal E R
J Trauma. 1979 Sep;19(9):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197909000-00004.
Abdominal stab wounds are managed on a selective basis with increasing frequency. Retroperitoneal injuries are more difficult to evaluate; hence wounds to the flank and back pose different considerations. A retrospective review of 108 patients with deep stab wounds of the flank and back was compared with a prospective study of 109 patients selectively managed with similar injuries. Physical examination was accurate in 86% of flank and 88% of back wounds. Local exploration was an effective procedure in differentiating superficial from deep wounds. Peritoneal lavage may be more accurate in flank wounds but is probably less reliable with retroperitoneal injuries. Adjunctive studies are helpful in selected patients. The incidence of negative celiotomies was reduced from 85.2% to 7.3% when the selective approach was adopted. There was no mortality or increased morbidity in the series. Although the risk of retroperitoneal injury is greater with flank and back wounds, frequent examination by the same observer combined with adjunctive studies in selected cases appears to be a safe, reliable method of managing patients with stab wounds of the back and flank.
腹部刺伤的处理越来越多地基于选择性原则。腹膜后损伤更难评估;因此,侧腹和背部的伤口需要不同的考量。对108例侧腹和背部深部刺伤患者的回顾性研究与对109例选择性处理的类似损伤患者的前瞻性研究进行了比较。体格检查对86%的侧腹伤口和88%的背部伤口诊断准确。局部探查是区分表浅伤口和深部伤口的有效方法。腹腔灌洗对侧腹伤口可能更准确,但对腹膜后损伤可能可靠性较差。辅助检查对部分患者有帮助。采用选择性处理方法时,阴性剖腹探查的发生率从85.2%降至7.3%。该系列中无死亡病例或发病率增加情况。虽然侧腹和背部伤口导致腹膜后损伤的风险更大,但由同一名观察者进行频繁检查并结合对部分病例的辅助检查,似乎是处理侧腹和背部刺伤患者的一种安全、可靠的方法。