Mewe L
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1979 May;174(5):756-9.
The judgement of disablement is of special economic and social-medical importance. While there are nearly no differences between physicians concerning the judgement of disablement in cases of grave ophthalmological clinical pictures, there exist greater differences in the judgement of so-called "bagatelle"-injuries and -diseases, which demand a temporary unilateral eye-dressing. The problem of functional unilateral vision up to now was considered under the aspect of a lasting disease, but not for a short period of time. A unique decision concerning the disablement should be aimed at by all medical practitioners. In addition to the judgement of disablement the private insurances demand a detailed report for the temporary impairment of disablement, which by no means can be demanded from the ophthalmologists.
残疾判定具有特殊的经济和社会医学重要性。虽然在严重眼科临床病例的残疾判定方面，医生之间几乎没有差异，但在所谓的“轻微”损伤和疾病（这些情况需要临时单侧眼部包扎）的判定上存在较大差异。到目前为止，功能性单眼视力问题一直是从持续性疾病的角度来考虑的，而不是短期情况。所有医学从业者都应致力于做出关于残疾的统一判定。除了残疾判定外，私人保险公司还要求提供一份关于残疾临时损害的详细报告，而这绝不能要求眼科医生提供。
