• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力正常者和听力受损者对英语辅音的差异评级。

Dissimilarity ratings of English consonants by normally-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.

作者信息

Danhauer J L, Lawarre R M

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Jun;22(2):236-46. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2202.236.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2202.236
PMID:491553
Abstract

Perceptual patterns in rating dissimilarities among 24 CVs were investigated for a group of normal-hearing and two groups of hearing-impaired subjects (one group with flat, and one group with sloping, sensorineural losses). Stimuli were presented binaurally at most comfortable loudness level and subjects rated the 576 paired stimuli on a 1-7 equal-appearing interval scale. Ratings were submitted to individual group and combined INDSCAL analyses to describe features used by the subjects in their perception of the speech stimuli. Results revealed features such as sibilant, sonorant, plosive and place. Furthermore, normal and hearing-impaired subjects used similar features, and subjects' weightings of features were relatively independent of their audiometric configurations. Results are compared to those of previous studies.

摘要

针对一组听力正常的受试者以及两组听力受损受试者(一组为平坦型感音神经性听力损失,另一组为斜坡型感音神经性听力损失),研究了在评估24份简历的差异时的感知模式。刺激以双耳方式呈现于最舒适响度水平,受试者在1至7的等距量表上对576对刺激进行评分。评分结果提交给各个组以及合并的INDSCAL分析,以描述受试者在感知言语刺激时所使用的特征。结果揭示了诸如咝音、响音、爆破音和发音部位等特征。此外,正常受试者和听力受损受试者使用了相似的特征,并且受试者对特征的加权相对独立于他们的听力测定配置。将结果与先前研究的结果进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Dissimilarity ratings of English consonants by normally-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.听力正常者和听力受损者对英语辅音的差异评级。
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Jun;22(2):236-46. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2202.236.
2
Consonant similarity judgments by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.正常和听力受损听众的辅音相似性判断。
J Speech Hear Res. 1980 Mar;23(1):162-84. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2301.162.
3
Consonant perception by normals in conditions of filtering.正常人在过滤条件下的辅音感知。
J Am Aud Soc. 1978 Nov-Dec;4(3):117-21.
4
Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition.听力损失对塞音识别中短时长频谱线索利用的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jun;81(6):1940-7. doi: 10.1121/1.394758.
5
Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.正常听力和听力受损受试者的频率辨别能力及塞音识别
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Mar;32(1):133-42. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3201.133.
6
Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.听力受损者对言语刺激的最舒适和最不舒适响度水平的变异性。
Ear Hear. 1989 Apr;10(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00003.
7
Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.模拟听力损失对双语儿童噪声中辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e292-e304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000428.
8
Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.爆破音爆发的时间内语音掩蔽:听力损失和频率整形的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):554-63. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/038).
9
Dimensions of consonant perception in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.正常和听力受损听众的辅音感知维度。
J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Sep;18(3):444-55. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1803.444.
10
Visual speech processing: word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment.视觉言语处理:与基于句子的唇读和听力障碍相关的单词解码和单词辨别
Scand J Psychol. 1991;32(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1991.tb00847.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.噪声下辅音识别与听力阈值的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):460-73. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0239). Epub 2011 Dec 22.
2
Separating the redundancy of voicing from nasality in American English.区分美式英语中浊音与鼻音的冗余部分。
J Psycholinguist Res. 1987 Jan;16(1):11-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01067748.