Weiner H
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Jun;48(3 Pt 2):1083-90. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.3c.1083.
Schizophrenics and controls (normals and alcoholics) were compared in terms of their rates of talking (on any topic) and button-press responding when they were instructed to respond in certain ways and when they were reinforced for responding under a fixed ratio (FR) schedule. Subjects were given complete information about response-reinforcement relationships under the FR schedule. The results showed that, when subjects were told to talk at different rates, response rates of the schizophrenics and controls were fairly comparable. Reinforced rates of talking and button pressing were higher than non-reinforced rates for both the schizophrenics and controls. However, reinforced rates of talking and button-pressing were lower for the schizophrenics compared to the controls. Such apathetic responding by the schizophrenics could not be attributed readily to medication, to a limited capacity for response, to difficulties in understanding the instructions or the contingencies of reinforcement, to the rates of non-reinforced responding, or to the value of the reinforcer (money). It was suggested that the absence of instructions which told the schizophrenics at what rate to respond under the FR schedule may have been a factor.
对精神分裂症患者与对照组(正常人和酗酒者)在以下方面进行了比较:当他们按照特定方式做出反应以及在固定比率(FR)强化程序下做出反应并得到强化时,他们的谈话速率(关于任何话题)和按键反应速率。向受试者完整说明了FR强化程序下的反应-强化关系。结果显示,当告知受试者以不同速率谈话时,精神分裂症患者和对照组的反应速率相当。对于精神分裂症患者和对照组来说,有强化的谈话和按键速率均高于无强化的速率。然而,与对照组相比,精神分裂症患者有强化的谈话和按键速率较低。精神分裂症患者这种冷漠的反应不能轻易归因于药物治疗、反应能力有限、理解指令或强化意外情况困难、无强化反应的速率或强化物(金钱)的价值。有人提出,在FR强化程序下未告知精神分裂症患者以何种速率做出反应的指令可能是一个因素。