Suppr超能文献

[硬质管支气管镜检查,一种过时的方法?]

[Bronchoscopy with a rigid tube, an obsolete method?].

作者信息

Hürzeler D

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Sep 8;109(34):1259-61.

PMID:493914
Abstract

Of the two methods of bronchoscopy, the rigid bronchoscope and the flexible instrument, it is clear that one cannot be used to the complete exclusion of the other. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. The rigid tube has many diagnostic and especially therapeutic advantages in the main bronchi, while the flexible instrument displays its strong points in the peripheral areas. The two methods complement one another. Bronchofiberscopy alone cannot be recommended, but if it is carried out nevertheless it is merely a general bronchoscopy and the limitations must be taken into consideration. It must be possible to deal with any complications which may arise.

摘要

在两种支气管镜检查方法中,即硬支气管镜和软质器械,显然不能完全排斥使用其中一种。两种方法都有其优缺点。硬质镜在主支气管中有许多诊断尤其是治疗上的优势,而软质器械在周边区域则显示出其长处。这两种方法相辅相成。单独推荐纤维支气管镜检查是不可取的,但如果仍然进行,那也仅仅是一种普通的支气管镜检查,必须考虑到其局限性。必须能够处理可能出现的任何并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验