Dammermann W
Z Rechtsmed. 1979 Jul 17;83(2):149-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02092272.
The objections in the following comments on a recent paper by Tausch et al. (1978) are raised principally to the points that the mass of the projectile is given an importance for the penetration which is not justified, and that the inherent uncertainty of the measurement data and the scope of validity of the empirical formulas are not sufficiently taken into account. The discussion on the process of penetration and a discontinuity of the depth of penetration as a function of the velocity of the bullet is of fundamental significance, with consequences for the definition of the critical velocity.
以下对陶施等人（1978年）近期一篇论文的评论中的异议，主要针对的是：射弹质量对侵彻的重要性被赋予了不合理的权重，以及测量数据的固有不确定性和经验公式的有效性范围没有得到充分考虑。关于侵彻过程以及侵彻深度作为子弹速度函数的不连续性的讨论具有根本意义，这对临界速度的定义有影响。
