Steiner R W, Blantz R C
Am J Physiol. 1979 Nov;237(5):F386-91. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1979.237.5.F386.
Glomerular hemodynamics were measured by micropuncture technique in the plasma volume-expanded Munich-Wistar rat in 1) a control group, 2) during a pressor infusion of angiotensin II (AII), and 3) during simultaneous infusions of AII and saralasin, which returned arterial pressure to normal. Respective values obtained in the three groups studied were: nephron filtration rate: 60 +/- 2 vs. 40 +/- 2 vs. 42 +/- 2 nl.min-1.g kidney wt-1; nepphron plasma flow: 263 +/- 13 vs. 106 +/- 5 vs. 165 +/- 13 nl. min-1.g kidney wt-1; LpA, the glomerular permeability coefficient: 0.090 +/- 0.009 vs. 0.033 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.103 +/- 0.020 nl.s-1.g kidney wt-1. mmHg-1; afferent arteriolar resistance: 10.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 25.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 19.7 +/- 3.3 10(9) dyn.s.cm-5; efferent arteriolar resistance: 7.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 22.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 10.8 +/- 1.7 10(9) dyn.s.cm-5. Saralasin acutely reversed the effect of AII on both efferent resistance and LpA, suggesting that AII does not decrease LpA by inducing a fixed anatomic change. For unclear reasons, saralasin did not reverse the increase in afferent resistance associated with infusion of AII. Saralasin infusion in high AII states may acutely affect glomerular hemodynamics by decreasing efferent resistance and increasing the glomerular permeability coefficient.
采用微穿刺技术测定血浆容量扩张的慕尼黑-威斯塔大鼠的肾小球血流动力学,实验分三组:1)对照组;2)静脉输注血管紧张素II(AII)使血压升高时;3)同时输注AII和沙拉新使动脉血压恢复正常时。三组实验得到的各自数据如下:肾单位滤过率:60±2 vs. 40±2 vs. 42±2 nl·min⁻¹·g肾重⁻¹;肾单位血浆流量:263±13 vs. 106±5 vs. 165±13 nl·min⁻¹·g肾重⁻¹;LpA(肾小球通透系数):0.090±0.009 vs. 0.033±0.005 vs. 0.103±0.020 nl·s⁻¹·g肾重⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹;入球小动脉阻力:10.2±0.7 vs. 25.1±1.3 vs. 19.7±3.3×10⁹ dyn·s·cm⁻⁵;出球小动脉阻力:7.8±0.5 vs. 22.0±0.9 vs. 10.8±1.7×10⁹ dyn·s·cm⁻⁵。沙拉新可迅速逆转AII对出球小动脉阻力和LpA的影响,提示AII并非通过诱导固定的解剖学改变来降低LpA。原因不明的是,沙拉新未能逆转与输注AII相关的入球小动脉阻力增加。在高AII状态下输注沙拉新可能通过降低出球小动脉阻力和增加肾小球通透系数而急性影响肾小球血流动力学。