Masouredis S P, Dupuy M E, Elliot M
J Clin Invest. 1967 May;46(5):681-94. doi: 10.1172/JCI105569.
The red cells of 63 members of 11 families were tested with (125)I-labeled anti-Rh(0)(D). Families with a history of hemolytic disease of the newborn due to fetomaternal Rh incompatibility were selected for study. In such families it was possible to determine the antibody binding to the Rh(0)(D) heterozygous red cells of the children and to compare within each family this value with the antibody bound to the father's Rh(0)(D)-positive red cells and the mother's Rh(0)(D)-negative red cells. The fathers in all the families studied could be assigned to two classes on the basis of the quantity of antibody bound to their red cells. One group bound about the same quantity of antibody to their cells as did their children, indicating that they were heterozygous for the Rh(0)(D) antigen. The other bound about twice as much antibody to their cells as did their children, indicating that they were homozygous for the antigen. The Rh genotype of the father in all 11 families could be ascertained by using the children in each family as a reference point. The members of two families showed a poor correspondence between antibody binding and zygosity. In one family an Rh heterozygous child (R(1)r) took up 85% of the antibody bound to the father's homozygous cells (R(1)R(1)), and in the other family an Rh heterozygous child (R(1)r) took up 20% more antibody than did the cells of her father, which were of the same Rh phenotype (Rh(1)) and zygosity.The quantity of antibody bound to the red cells of unrelated Rh(0)(D) homozygous individuals of the same Rh phenotype (Rh(1)) showed an almost sixfold variation. A consequence of this observation was that the cells of Rh(0)(D) heterozygous children of high antibody uptake fathers took up more antibody than did the cells of low antibody uptake Rh(0)(D) homozygous fathers. The gene dosage effect for the Rh(0)(D) antigen demonstrable within a family does not appear to apply when unrelated individuals are tested, even though they may be of the same Rh phenotype.
用¹²⁵I标记的抗 - Rh(0)(D)对11个家族的63名成员的红细胞进行了检测。选择有因母婴Rh血型不合导致新生儿溶血病病史的家族进行研究。在这些家族中,可以确定抗体与儿童Rh(0)(D)杂合红细胞的结合情况,并在每个家族中将该值与结合在父亲Rh(0)(D)阳性红细胞和母亲Rh(0)(D)阴性红细胞上的抗体进行比较。根据结合在其红细胞上的抗体量,所有研究家族中的父亲可分为两类。一组与他们孩子的细胞结合的抗体量大致相同,表明他们是Rh(0)(D)抗原的杂合子。另一组与他们孩子的细胞结合的抗体量大约是孩子的两倍,表明他们是该抗原的纯合子。以每个家族中的孩子作为参考点,可以确定所有11个家族中父亲的Rh基因型。两个家族的成员在抗体结合与合子性之间表现出较差的对应关系。在一个家族中,一个Rh杂合子儿童(R¹r)结合了与父亲纯合细胞(R¹R¹)结合的抗体的85%,而在另一个家族中,一个Rh杂合子儿童(R¹r)比其父亲具有相同Rh表型(Rh¹)和合子性的细胞多结合了20%的抗体。与相同Rh表型(Rh¹)的无关Rh(0)(D)纯合个体的红细胞结合的抗体量显示出近六倍的差异。这一观察结果的一个后果是,高抗体摄取父亲的Rh(0)(D)杂合子儿童的细胞比低抗体摄取Rh(0)(D)纯合父亲的细胞结合更多的抗体。即使无关个体可能具有相同Rh表型,但在家族中可证明的Rh(0)(D)抗原的基因剂量效应在检测无关个体时似乎并不适用。