Sumner D S, Russell J B, Ramsey D E, Hajjar W M, Miles R D
Arch Surg. 1979 Nov;114(11):1222-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350024002.
Two hundred consecutive internal carotid arteries were examined with the Hokanson-pulsed Doppler ultrasonic arteriograph (UA) and the Kartchner-McCrae oculoplethysmograph (OPG). Roentgenographic studies were used to assess the relative accuracy of these two noninvasive tests. Diameter stenoses estimated from the UA and roentgenographic images agreed within +/- 20% in 81% of the studies. The UA detected 61% of all stenoses of 20% to 39% and 89% of all stenoses greater than 40%. A sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 90% were achieved with the UA compared with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 85% with the OPG. When the UA and OPG agreed (67% of the vessels), the sensitivity was 95% and the specificity was 94%. When they disagreed, the UA was the better test having a sensitivity of 81% compared with 21% with the OPG.
使用霍坎森脉冲多普勒超声动脉造影仪(UA)和卡特chner-麦克雷眼体积描记仪(OPG)对200条连续的颈内动脉进行了检查。采用X线摄影研究来评估这两种非侵入性检查的相对准确性。在81%的研究中,根据UA和X线摄影图像估计的直径狭窄率在±20%范围内一致。UA检测出所有20%至39%狭窄中的61%以及所有大于40%狭窄中的89%。与OPG相比,UA的敏感性为86%,特异性为90%,而OPG的敏感性为64%,特异性为85%。当UA和OPG结果一致时(67%的血管),敏感性为95%,特异性为94%。当两者结果不一致时,UA是更好的检查方法,其敏感性为81%,而OPG为21%。