Gibbons G W, Wheelock F C, Siembieda C, Hoar C S, Rowbotham J L, Persson A B
Arch Surg. 1979 Nov;114(11):1253-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350055005.
Noninvasive laboratory testing was used to predict successful amputation levels in 150 diabetic patients. The cases of 100 patients undergoing forefoot amputation and 50 patients undergoing below-knee amputation were evaluated using segmental systolic pressures and pulse volume recordings (PVRs). The decision for and the level of amputation were based solely on clinical judgment. In patients undergoing forefoot amputation, segmental systolic pressures were falsely high or predicted incorrectly in over half the cases. Segment PVRs were correctly predictive in only half of the cases. In patients undergoing below-knee amputation, segment systolic pressures were falsely high or predicted incorrectly in over one third of cases. Segmental PVRs were correctly predictive in less than one third of the cases. In the diabetic patient, clinical judgment continues to provide the most accurate and reliable information by which the type of amputation and likelihood of its success can be judged.
采用非侵入性实验室检测来预测150例糖尿病患者的截肢平面。使用节段收缩压和脉搏容积记录(PVR)对100例行前足截肢的患者和50例行膝下截肢的患者进行评估。截肢的决策和平面完全基于临床判断。在行前足截肢的患者中,超过半数的病例节段收缩压存在假性升高或预测错误。节段PVR仅在半数病例中预测正确。在行膝下截肢的患者中,超过三分之一的病例节段收缩压存在假性升高或预测错误。节段PVR在不到三分之一的病例中预测正确。对于糖尿病患者,临床判断仍然是判断截肢类型及其成功可能性的最准确和可靠的信息来源。