Barry R J
Biol Psychol. 1979 May;8(3):161-78. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(79)90045-0.
Recent studies have generated a four-system structure proposed as a replacement for Sokolov's unitary OR concept. This conceptualisation developed from a logical consideration of stimulus--response relationships based upon mean response magnitudes over subjects, and paid no attention to individual response types. It is conceivable that no individual subject exhibited responses compatible with such a formulation. This paper addressed that problem by using factor analysis as a means of descriptively summarising the data of each subject, and examining its compatibility with both unitary and four-system structures. Of 72 subjects, none exhibited a factor structure compatible with Sokolov's unitary concept, while 70 exhibited structures compatible with the four-system structure. These results support the validity of the structure proposed to replace the unitary OR.
最近的研究提出了一种四系统结构，以取代索科洛夫的单一OR概念。这种概念化是基于对受试者平均反应幅度的刺激-反应关系进行逻辑思考而发展起来的，并且没有关注个体反应类型。可以想象，没有任何个体受试者表现出与这种表述相符的反应。本文通过使用因子分析来描述性地总结每个受试者的数据，并检验其与单一结构和四系统结构的兼容性，从而解决了这个问题。在72名受试者中，没有一人表现出与索科洛夫单一概念相符的因子结构，而70人表现出与四系统结构相符的结构。这些结果支持了所提出的取代单一OR结构的有效性。
