Wilson A C, Sarich V M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1088-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1088.
We discuss published molecular evidence concerning the relationship of man to African apes and Old World monkeys. Quantitative comparisons of their serum albumins, transferrins, hemoglobins, and DNA show that man is genetically much more similar to the African apes than to the Old World monkeys. The amino acid sequences of hemoglobins from humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and rhesus monkeys are consistent with the hypothesis that the probability of an amino acid substitution occurring in a given interval of time is the same for every hemoglobin lineage. This allows the use of these data as a hemoglobin evolutionary clock, just as we have previously done with the albumins. It is shown that concordance exists between the hemoglobin and albumin results and that both support the suggestion that the human lineage diverged from that leading to the African apes far more recently than is generally supposed. Considering both the albumin and hemoglobin data, we would set the most probable date at 4 to 5 million years.
我们讨论已发表的有关人类与非洲猿及旧世界猴关系的分子证据。对它们的血清白蛋白、转铁蛋白、血红蛋白和DNA进行的定量比较表明,人类在基因上与非洲猿的相似程度远高于与旧世界猴的相似程度。人类、黑猩猩、大猩猩和恒河猴血红蛋白的氨基酸序列与以下假设一致:在给定时间间隔内发生氨基酸替换的概率对于每个血红蛋白谱系都是相同的。这使得这些数据可以像我们之前对白蛋白所做的那样,用作血红蛋白进化时钟。结果表明,血红蛋白和白蛋白的结果存在一致性,且两者都支持这样的观点:人类谱系与导致非洲猿的谱系分化的时间比通常认为的要近得多。综合考虑白蛋白和血红蛋白数据,我们认为最可能的时间是400万至500万年前。