Sweetnam R, Knowelden J, Seddon H
Br Med J. 1971 May 15;2(5758):363-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5758.363.
A retrospective survey of all cases of osteosarcoma of the femur and tibia treated at the major centres in the United Kingdom during 1952-9 was carried out in an attempt to assess the respective value of treatment by surgery and radiotherapy and the feasibility of a larger prospective study. Of the 192 patients available for the comparison, those treated by radiotherapy alone did least well. A combination of the two treatments-radiotherapy followed by amputation-produced better results, in terms of survival, than amputation alone; however, the comparatively small numbers involved and the inadequacy of information about the factors dictating the choice of treatment make firm conclusions impossible. A controlled clinical trial on a larger scale might provide answers to the outstanding questions.
对1952年至1959年间在英国主要中心接受治疗的所有股骨和胫骨骨肉瘤病例进行了回顾性调查,旨在评估手术和放疗的各自价值以及进行更大规模前瞻性研究的可行性。在可供比较的192例患者中,仅接受放疗的患者预后最差。两种治疗方法相结合——放疗后截肢——在生存率方面比单纯截肢产生了更好的结果;然而,涉及的病例数量相对较少,且关于决定治疗选择的因素的信息不足,因此无法得出确凿的结论。更大规模的对照临床试验可能会为悬而未决的问题提供答案。