• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Validation of a bench stepping test for cardiorespiratory fitness classification of emergency service personnel.

作者信息

Davis J A, Wilmore J H

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1979 Oct;21(10):671-3.

PMID:501456
Abstract

Field tests are used in many occupations to screen and classify personnel for cardiorespiratory fitness. Presumably these tests yield predictive results which correlate well with maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), the most widely-accepted criterion of cardiorespiratory fitness. The purpose of this study was to validate one of the most popular field tests, the modified Kasch Pulse Recovery Step Test (KPRST), used by several emergency service agencies in Southern California. One hundred fourteen male state traffic officers from the California Highway Patrol, ranging in age from 24 to 56 years, performed treadmill VO2 max tests to volitional fatigue and the modified KPRST. Heart rates taken during the first and last 10 seconds of the one-minute recovery period for the modified KPRST compared against treadmill VO2 max values yielded correlations of --0.25 and --0.27, respectively, indicating that the modified KPRST is a poor predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness for the population studied. These results suggest that agencies should carefully validate any predictive measure of cardiorespiratory health and performance before adopting that measure for screening purposes and cardiorespiratory classification.

摘要

相似文献

1
Validation of a bench stepping test for cardiorespiratory fitness classification of emergency service personnel.
J Occup Med. 1979 Oct;21(10):671-3.
2
The maximum oxygen intake. An international reference standard of cardiorespiratory fitness.最大摄氧量。一项心肺适能的国际参考标准。
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(5):757-64.
3
Cardiorespiratory variables in middle-aged men.中年男性的心肺变量
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977 Oct;58(10):444-8.
4
Evaluation of a step-test for assessing the cardiorespiratory capacity of workers in Thailand: a pilot study.泰国工人心肺功能评估的台阶试验:一项初步研究
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2002 Dec;31(1-2):33-40.
5
A comparison between predicted VO2 max from the Astrand procedure and the Canadian Home Fitness Test.阿斯特兰德法预测的最大摄氧量与加拿大家庭健身测试之间的比较。
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979 Sep;4(3):214-8.
6
Reliability and validity of three fitness tests for adults with mental handicaps.针对成年智力障碍者的三项体能测试的信度与效度
Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Dec;17(4):309-15.
7
A stair-climb test of cardiorespiratory fitness for Singapore.新加坡心肺适能的爬楼梯测试。
Singapore Med J. 2000 Dec;41(12):588-94.
8
A comparison of some indirect methods for predicting maximal oxygen uptake.几种预测最大摄氧量的间接方法的比较。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1980 Oct;51(10):1128-33.
9
Selection of a maximal test protocol to validate the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test.选择最大测试方案以验证加拿大有氧适能测试。
Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Jun;17(2):114-9.
10
Field testing of cardiorespiratory fitness in primary school children.小学生心肺适能的现场测试。
Med Sci Sports. 1978 Fall;10(3):208-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational demand and human rights. Public safety officers and cardiorespiratory fitness.职业需求与人权。公共安全官员与心肺适能。
Sports Med. 1991 Aug;12(2):94-109. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199112020-00003.