West K M
Diabetes Care. 1979 Jul-Aug;2(4):381-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.2.4.381.
Considerable uncertainty and disagreement now prevail concerning the utility and priority of community screening programs for diabetes. A large majority of diabetologists believe that substantial benefits attend the early discovery of diabetes. Official statements of the American Diabetes Association support the view that mitigation of hyperglycemia lowers risk of morbidity. Much recent evidence indicates that aggressive early treatment often improves beta-cell function, thereby diminishing the severity of diabetes. Even so, some diabetologists and public health specialists question the practical benefits of community screening programs. Indeed, there is considerable evidence that, as previously performed, results sometimes have not justified costs. This article suggests that, when well designed, community screening is stil justified in some circumstances. To a considerable degree, failures of the past are correctable. The American Diabetes Association should neither approve nor disapprove community screening indisciminately. Affiliate organizations and health departments should be free to examine available evidence and local circumstances and, then, to decide whether to undertake screening programs. More care is needed in planning, executing, and critically evaluating these programs, but there is impressive and mounting evidence supporting the potential utility of the early discovery of diabetes.
目前,关于糖尿病社区筛查项目的效用和优先级存在相当大的不确定性和分歧。绝大多数糖尿病专家认为,早期发现糖尿病有诸多益处。美国糖尿病协会的官方声明支持这样一种观点,即控制高血糖可降低发病风险。近期的大量证据表明,积极的早期治疗通常能改善β细胞功能,从而减轻糖尿病的严重程度。即便如此,一些糖尿病专家和公共卫生专家对社区筛查项目的实际益处提出质疑。事实上,有大量证据表明,就以往的情况而言,有时结果并不值得付出成本。本文表明,精心设计的社区筛查在某些情况下仍然是合理的。在很大程度上,过去的失败是可以纠正的。美国糖尿病协会不应不加区分地批准或不批准社区筛查。附属组织和卫生部门应能够自由审查现有证据和当地情况,然后决定是否开展筛查项目。在规划、实施和严格评估这些项目时需要更加谨慎,但有令人印象深刻且越来越多的证据支持早期发现糖尿病的潜在效用。