Persinger B D, Holmes C B
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Oct;35(4):798-801. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197910)35:4<798::aid-jclp2270350423>3.0.co;2-3.
Examined 241 Memory-For-Designs protocols for the drawing styles of closure difficulty, figure-size expansion, and figure-size constriction. Chi squares then were employed to compare those data with the personality traits of the Ss. Personality traits were assessed through use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. The major conclusion drawn from the data analysis was that regardless of his or her personality trait, a S will perform like most other Ss in relation to Memory-For-Designs test behavior. The Ss were university students between the ages of 18 and 23, male or female, who were U. S. citizens attending Emporia State University. Initially, Ss were given the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire in groups. Ss who met sample qualifications on the personality test were asked to return for an individual follow-up test with the Memory-For-Design.
研究了241份记忆设计协议的封闭难度、图形尺寸扩展和图形尺寸收缩的绘图风格。然后采用卡方检验将这些数据与受试者的人格特质进行比较。人格特质通过使用十六种人格因素问卷进行评估。数据分析得出的主要结论是,无论受试者的人格特质如何,在记忆设计测试行为方面,受试者的表现都与大多数其他受试者相似。受试者为年龄在18至23岁之间的大学生,男女不限,均为就读于埃姆波里亚州立大学的美国公民。最初,受试者以小组形式接受十六种人格因素问卷测试。在人格测试中符合抽样资格的受试者被要求回来进行记忆设计的个体后续测试。